You are viewing this page on 911Research.com, which is the backup mirror of 911Research.WTC7.net .
The original page is at http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/collapse/smashdown.html.
Please link to the original page rather than this mirror page.
<< PREVIOUS Evaluating Collapse Theories NEXT >>

The Pile Driver/Smashdown Theory

NIST avoids explicitly endorsing the piledriver theory, but its theory depends on it.

It gets closer to explicitly endorsing it in the few additions of the Final Report to the Draft Report

Failure of the south wall in WTC 1 and east wall in WTC2 caused the portion of the building above to tilt in the direction of the failed wall. The tilting was accompanied by a downward movement. The story immediately below the stories in which the columns failed was not able to arrest this initial movement as evidenced by videos from several vantage points.

The structure below the level of the collapse initiation offered minimal resistance to the falling building mass at and above the impact zone. The potential energy released by the downward movement of the large building mass far exceeded the capacity of the intact structures below to absorb that through energy of deformation.
(p 146/196)

Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance to the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section above came down essentially in free fall, as seen in videos. As the stories below sequentially failed, the falling mass increases, further increasing the demand of the floors below, which were unable to arrest the moving mass.
(p 146/196)
page 73 Copyright 2006 911research.wtc7.net
<< PREVIOUS INDEX NEXT >>