| Smirking Chimp Sponsors | | Gear-Up Now to Save America! |  | Anti-Bush and pro-America shirts, stickers, buttons, magnets, mugs, etc. Share your opinions and ideals Beat Bush's right-wing agenda Have a laugh or two Get a few to express yourself Perfect gifts for your friends & family! | | Read More... |
| | Appease Your Inner Freak |  | Express your subversive self and check out www.tshirtgremlin.com . Over 250 t-shirt designs to appease your inner freak!
Women-owned and operated since 1999, and always doing our best to piss off the right wing!
Current sale . . . Buy 3, Get 1 Free! | | Read More... |
| | Our Divided Nation |  | | Join us for the free Metro America Webinar Premier featuring Amy Goodman. | | Read More... |
| Click here for advertising info |
|
Smirky Recommends
| |
Buy this item via this link at Amazon.com and 15% of the purchase price will be donated back to Smirking Chimp!
|
|
Boot Bush Countdown
| |
51 days, 7 hours, 35 minutes, 0 seconds until Inauguration Day 2005
|
|
Contribute!
|
Did we miss something? Go here to submit a news item or op-ed piece for inclusion on the home page.
|
|
Get The Smirking Chimp on your PDA
| |
Click here to add The Smirking Chimp to your AvantGo channels.
|
|
Who's Online
|
There are currently, 59 guest(s) and 24 member(s) that are online.
You are Anonymous user. You can register for free by clicking here.
|
 | |
| The First Family |
Margie Burns: 'Secrecy surrounds a Bush brother's role in 9/11 security'
Posted on Monday, January 20 @ 09:35:31 EST
By Margie Burns, American Reporter
WASHINGTON -- A company that provided security at New York City's World
Trade Center, Dulles International Airport in Washington, D.C., and to
United Airlines between 1995 and 2001, was backed by a private
Kuwaiti-American investment firm with ties to a brother of President
Bush and the Bush family, according to records obtained by the American
Reporter.
Two planes hijacked on Sept. 11, 2001 were United Airlines planes, and
another took off from Dulles International Airport; two, of ocurse,
slammed into the World Trade Center. But the Bush Administration has
never disclosed the ties of a presidential brother and the Bush family
with the firm that intersected the weapons and targets on a day of
national tragedy.
Marvin P. Bush, a younger brother of George W. Bush, was a principal in
the company from 1993 to 2000, when most of the work on the big
projects was done. But White House responses to 9/11 have not publicly
disclosed the company's part in providing security to any of the named
facilities, and many of the public records revealing the relationships
are not public.
Nonetheless,
public records reveal that the firm, formerly named Securacom, listed
Bush on its board of directors and as a significant shareholder. The
firm, now named Stratesec, Inc., is located in Sterling, Va., a suburb
of Washington, D.C., and emphasizes federal clients. Bush is no longer
on the board.
Marvin Bush has not responded to repeated telephoned and emailed requests for comment on this story.
The American Stock Exchange delisted Stratesec's stock in October 2002.
Securacom also had a contract to provide security at Los Alamos
National Laboratories, notorious for its security breaches and physical
and intellectual property thefts.
According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an
ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to
the day the buildings fell down." Yet instead of being investigated,
the company and companies involved with it have benefited from
legislation pushed by the Bush White House and rubber-stamped by
Congressional Republicans. Stratesec, its backer KuwAm, and their
corporate officers stand to benefit from limitations on liability and
national-security protections from investigation provided in bills
since 9/11.
HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc., a reinsurance corporation on whose board
Marvin Bush sat as director until November 2002, similarly benefits
from terrorism insurance protections. (Bush's first year on the board
at HCC coincided with his last year on the board at Stratesec.) HCC,
formerly Houston Casualty Company, carried some of the insurance for
the World Trade Center. It posted a loss for the quarter after the
attacks of Sept. 11 and dropped participation in worker's compensation
as a result. Bush remains an adviser to the chairman and the Board of
Directors, as well as a member of the company's investment committee.
The former CEO of Stratesec is Wirt D. Walker III, who is still
chairman of the board. Although he has also been the managing director
of KuwAm for several years, Walker states definitively in phone
interviews that there was no exchange of talent between Stratesec and
KuwAm during the World Trade Center and other projects.
As Walker put it, "I'm an investment banker." He continued, "We just
owned some stock." The investment company "was not involved in any way
in the work or day-to-day operations" of the security company. He
explained clearly and pleasantly that there was no sharing of
information or of personnel between the two companies.
In December 2000 - when the outcome of the U.S. presidential election
was determined - Stratesec added a government division, providing "the
same full range of security systems services as the Commercial
Division," the company says. Stratesec now has "an open-ended contract
with the General Services Administration (GSA) and a Blanket Purchase
Agreement (BPA) with the agency that allows the government to purchase
materials and services from the Company without having to go through a
full competition."
The company lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S
Air force, and the Department of Justice," in projects that "often
require state-of-the-art security solutions for classified or high-risk
government sites." In 2000, the U.S. Army accounted for 29 percent of
the company's earned revenues, or about $6.9 million.
The White House opposed an independent commission to investigate 9/11
until after the terrorism insurance protections and protections for
security companies had safely passed Congress. It has also quietly
intervened in lawsuits against United Airlines in New York, brought by
relatives of the victims.
Marvin Bush joined Securacom's Board of Directors in 1993, as part of
new management hired when the company separated from engineering firm
Burns and Roe. The new team was capitalized by KuwAm, the D.C.-based
Kuwaiti-American investment company. Bush also served on the Board of
Directors at KuwAm, along with Mishal Yousef Saud al-Sabah, Chairman of
KuwAm and also a Director on Securacom's (Stratesec's) board.
The World Trade Center and the Metropolitan Washington Airport
Authority - which operates Dulles - were two of Securacom's three
biggest clients in 1996 and 1997. (The third was MCI, now WorldCom.)
Stratesec (Securacom) differs from other security companies which
separate the function of consultant from that of service provider. The
company defines itself as a "single-source" provider of "end-to-end"
security services, including everything from diagnosis of existing
systems to hiring subcontractors to installing video and electronic
equipment. It also provides armored vehicles and security guards.
When, following the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, the Port
Authority of New York and New Jersey began its multi-million-dollar,
multiyear revamping of security in and around the Twin Towers and
Buildings 4 and 5, Securacom was among numerous contractors hired in
the upgrade.
The companies doing security jobs received due mention in print, in
security industry publications and elsewhere. The board membership of a
son of former President Bush went unnoticed, at least in print.
According to SEC filings, Securacom/Stratesec acquired the $8.3 million
World Trade Center contract in October 1996. The project generated 28
percent of all revenues for the company in 1996. SEC filings indicate
that revenues from the World Trade Center project commenced in 1996 at
$1.6 million, peaked in 1997 at $6.6 million ($4.1 million in the first
half), and diminished in 1998 to less than $1 million.
A key concept in security is "access control." In hindsight, as the
security industry's reportage on the World Trade Center precautions
makes clear, further attacks would have to come from the air.
Unfortunately, such detailed reports did not convey that message at
home. Nobody thought outside the box enough to deduce that a jumbo jet
could overcome even the extraordinary controls at the World Trade
Center. With 20-20 hindsight, it is obvious that the intricate
procedures in the building's lobbies and on its perimeters were useless
in trying to stop a 767 loaded with jet fuel.
Barry McDaniel, CEO of the company since January 2002, declines on
security grounds to give specific details about work the company did at
the World Trade Center. According to McDaniel, the contract was ongoing
(a "completion contract"), and "not quite completed when the Center
went down." The company designed a system, but - as he points out -
that obviously "didn't have anything to do with planes flying into
buildings."
The key words "access control" are less feeble and irrelevant, however,
in regard to airports and airlines. Had the hijackers failed on the
ground, they would have lost their airborne weapon.
Two of the hijacked planes were United Airlines planes, and another
took off from Dulles International. Two hit the Twin Towers, leading to
a collapse of both buildings that killed nearly 3,000 people.
McDaniel makes clear that Securacom's contract with United Airlines was
a single-site contract, in Indianapolis (at least five years ago), and
not local. The work was finished several years before he joined the
board, and was not in or near Washington.
The Dulles Internation contract is another matter. Dulles is regarded
as "absolutely a sensitive airport," according to security consultant
Wayne Black, head of a Florida-based security firm, due to its
location, size, and the number of international carriers it serves.
Black has not heard of Stratesec, but responds that for one company to
handle security for both airports and airlines is somewhat unusual. It
is also delicate for a security firm serving international facilities
to be so interlinked with a foreign-owned company: "Somebody knew
somebody," he suggested, or the contract would have been more closely
scrutinized.
As Black points out, "when you [a company] have a security contract,
you know the inner workings of everything." And if another company is
linked with the security company, then "What's on your computer is on
their computer."
In this context, retired FAA special agent Brian F. Sullivan is angry,
and eloquent. "You can have all the security systems in the world, but
the people behind the systems make the difference." The Bush
administration, says Sullivan, "spit in the faces" of the victims'
families, in pushing for last-minute protections for foreign-owned
security companies (in the Homeland Security bill). Sullivan points out
that "not one single person" in an upper-level position has lost a job
as a result of 9/11, "not in the FBI, CIA, FAA, DOT." As he sums up,
"No accountability, no progress."
Stratesec got its first preventive maintenance contract with Dulles
Airport in 1995, generating $0.3 million that year. The Dulles project
generated revenue of $1.2 million in 1996, $2.5 million in 1997, and
$2.3 million in 1998, accounting for 22% of the company's revenues in
1996 and in 1998
Like other specialists, Professor Dale B. Oderman of Purdue
University's aviation technology department, concurs that Dulles "was
considered a very high profile target" as the primary international
airport near the nation's capital. It serves as port of entry to about
15 international airlines as well as serving eight of the 11 major us
passenger carriers. In comparison, Reagan Airport hosts only Air Canada
from outside the U.S., and Baltimore-Washington Airport hosts about a
half dozen."
Stratesec did not handle screening of passengers at Dulles. According
to a contracting official for the Metropolitan Washington Airport
Authority, its three-year contract was for maintenance of security
systems: It maintained the airfield access system, the CCTV (closed
circuit television) system, and the electronic badging system.
In 1997, the World Trade Center and Dulles accounted for 55 percent and
20 percent of the company's earned revenues, respectively. The World
Trade Center and Dulles projects figured largely in both Securacom's
growing revenues from 1995 to 1997 and its decreases from 1997 to 1998.
Stratesec continued to refer to "New York City's World Trade Center" as
a former client through April 2001. It listed Dulles Airport and United
Airlines as former clients through April 2002.
As with the World Trade Center - which also had electronic badging,
security gates, and CCTV - the ultimate problem with Dulles' security
controls was not the controls themselves, but that they could be
sidestepped. All the hijackers had to do was buy a ticket. As former
FAA special agent Sullivan comments, "If they [attackers] knew about
the security system, they knew how to bypass it."
One obvious question for investigators is how much potential hijackers could have known about the security system.
From 1993 to 1999, KuwAm - the Kuwait-American Corporation -- held a
large and often controlling interest in Securacom. In 1996, KuwAm
Corporation owned 90 percent of the company, either directly or through
partnerships like one called Special Situations Investment Holdings and
another called "Fifth Floor Company for General Trading and
Contracting." KuwAm owned 31 percent of Securacom in 1998 and 47
percent of Stratesec in 1999. It currently holds only about 205,000
shares of Stratesec; Walker, KuwAm's managing director, holds 650,000.
Marvin Bush was reelected annually to Securacom's board of directors
from 1993 through 1999. His final reelection was on May 25, 1999, for
July 1999 to June 2000. Throughout, he also served on the company's
Audit Committee and Compensation Committee, and his stock holdings grew
during the period. Directors had options to purchase 25,000 shares of
stock annually. In 1996, Bush acquired 53,000 shares at 52 cents per
share. Shares in the 1997 IPO sold at $8.50. Records since 2000 no
longer list Bush as a shareholder.
Stratesec and KuwAm were and still are intertwined at the top. Walker,
while a principal at Stratesec (a director since 1987, chairman of the
board since 1992, and formerly CEO since 1999), was also on the board
of directors at KuwAm and is still managing director (both since 1982).
Mishal Yousef Saud Al Sabah, the chairman at KuwAm, also served on
Stratesec's board from 1991 to 2001. Walker and Al Sabah had major
stock holdings in each other's companies. The sons of both also held
shares in the two companies.
Stratesec, which currently lists 45 employees, hired KuwAm for corporate secretarial services in 2002, at $2,500 per month.
For several years, Walker has also been chairman and CEO of an aircraft
company, Aviation General, about 70 percent owned by KuwAm.
The Saudi Arabian embassy, the Kuwait embassy, and KuwAm have office
suites in the Watergate complex, where both Stratesec and Aviation
General held their annual shareholders' meetings in 1999, 2000, and
2001. Bush was reelected to his annual board position there, across the
hall from a Saudi Arabian Airlines office. (This year, the companies'
shareholders meetings switched to the fifth floor, in space also
hleased by Saudis and Kuwaitis.)
Incidentally, Saudi Princess Haifa Al-Faisal had her checking account
at Riggs Bank, which has a large branch in the Watergate. Given that
Jonathan Bush, the president's uncle, is a Riggs executive, it is
difficult to understand any obstacle for American authorities pursuing
the recently reported "Saudi money trail." The princess's charitable
activities were processed through Riggs, but attention focused on the
Saudis seems not to extend to the politically-connected bank they used.
McDaniel was asked in a brief telephone interview whether FBI or other
agents have questioned him or others at Stratesec about the company's
security work in connection with 9/11. The concise answer: "No." Asked
the same question regarding KuwAm, Walker declined further comment, and
referred a reporter to the public record.
According to a spokesman in an FBI regional office, since October 2001,
"the investigation [of 9/11] is being coordinated at the national
level, directly from the White House." If so, you'd think that an
administration that could seriously consider infiltrating American
mosques would ask a few questions closer to home.
But the suggestion is inescapable that any investigation into security
arrangements preceding 9/11, at some of the nation's most sensitive
facilities, has been impeded to this day by narrowly political concerns
in the White House.
Margie Burns is a Texas native who now writes from Washington, D.C. Email her at margie.burns@verizon.net.
Copyright 2003 Joe Shea The American Reporter.
Reprinted from The American Reporter:
http://www.american-reporter.com/2021/3.html
|
| |
|
| "Margie Burns: 'Secrecy surrounds a Bush brother's role in 9/11 security'" | Login/Create Account | 7 comments | |
|
| The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content. |
Re: Margie Burns: 'Secrecy surrounds a Bush brother's role i (Score: 1) by BUCANERO on Monday, January 20 @ 10:10:40 EST (User Info) | | As
I said earlier concerning Neil Bush and Silverado "Savings", the Bush
Family are a cancer on America. Here is yet more proof. |
[ To reply to this message, you must first logon or register ]
Re: Margie Burns: 'Secrecy surrounds a Bush brother's role in 9/11 security' (Score: 1) by farmerbill on Monday, January 20 @ 14:17:20 EST (User Info) | a question for margie:
the "wirt d. walker III" name is intriguing to me. is there a
relationship between this walker and the bush family, or is it merely
another coincidence? "inquiring minds" and all that ... |
[ To reply to this message, you must first logon or register ]
Re: Margie Burns: 'Secrecy surrounds a Bush brother's role in 9/11 security' (Score: 1) by SnoopDopeyDogg (datruth.hertz.donut/GOPsux.com) on Tuesday, January 21 @ 01:42:39 EST (User Info) | I
think that the role that "privatization" played in 9/11 has never been
given its proper dues. No matter who was in charge of the private
firms(s) that controlled airport security, they FAILED. It is even made
more ironic by the fact that there were reports of the failures and
potential disasters from the underpaid airport screeners provided by
private security firms which were far more concerned with pocketing
your money than saving your life. Of course, Saddam Hussein is to
blame, not minimum wage rent-an-air-marshalls. The bottom line is that
had federally trained officers been in place instead, we would be
reading about the POTENTIAL terrorists who had been arrested at Dulles,
and 9/11 would have been just one more dismal day on Wall Street.
Maybe it will take the rape of Social Security to prove that
privitization is a failure. 9/11 should have been the final nail on the
coffin of this scam.
Just one more instance out of a seeming infinity of instances of the
corporate media looking out for its own interests, even if it kills you. |
[ To reply to this message, you must first logon or register ]
Re: Margie Burns: 'Secrecy surrounds a Bush brother's role i (Score: 1) by whiterose on Tuesday, January 21 @ 02:42:06 EST (User Info) | Burns
& Roe which spun off Securacom and then hired Bush (and Walker?)
was involved in bribing dictator in Phillipines, and also in an
Indonesian scandal. these are Wolfowtiz's clients, both in and out of
government.
In addition, Burns and Roe just was awarded a contract, along with a
Carlyle Group company, to "convert" uranium at Oak Ridge. The third
company, oddly, is based in Jerry Falwell's Lynchburg, Va.
these firms were involved in a whistle blower insident where low-paid
employees reported unsafe practices involving uranium, and suffered
retribution.
However, all of these Bush-related companies, (which had banded
together to form an entity which "bid" on the job) got the contract
from the Bush Administration.
What is uranium conversion, anyway? |
[ To reply to this message, you must first logon or register ]Re: Margie Burns: 'Secrecy surrounds a Bush brother's role i (Score: 1) by seventhgeneration on Tuesday, January 21 @ 05:10:32 EST (User Info) | It's part of the process to create Weapons of Mass Destruction and proliferate nuclear arms.
Of course ya gotta' get Jerry ta' bless the stuff, otherwise ya' goes ta' hell when ya' blows up a hundred thousand children. |
]
Re: Margie Burns: 'Secrecy surrounds a Bush brother's role in 9/11 security' (Score: 1) by seventhgeneration on Tuesday, January 21 @ 05:06:06 EST (User Info) | Where
are the closed circuit images of the hijackers? If a bush was on the
BOARD of DIRECTORS of the security company that set up these closed
circuit surveillance systems at Dulles International Airport, then
certainly they were effective enough to capture images of these 4 or 5
swarthy muslim hijackers boarding the plane.
I wonder what kind of videos bushy toes was watching on vactation at
the ranch. Maybe his brother sent him some original footage.
Maybe they are in Kuwait, or maybe right across the hall with the Saudi
Airline company ... or maybe none of this is real ... and you and me
... we don't exist at all.
Can I get one of those cool security badges they make for the Dulles
Airport at the company at which bush's brother was on the Board of
Directors, I could do anything I wanted with one of those. I could get
past security and hijack an airplane ... imagine that. |
[ To reply to this message, you must first logon or register ]
Re: Margie Burns: 'Secrecy surrounds a Bush brother's role in 9/11 security' (Score: 1) by GlenRoy on Wednesday, January 22 @ 09:59:57 EST (User Info) | There
is another familiar name in the article that deserves attention.
KuwAm's Chairman, Mishal Yousef Saud Al Sabah, appears (judging from
his name) to be a member of the family of the Kuwait Amir.
What is one of Bush's idiot sons doing on the board of KuwAm, and of
the majority-owned security firm, so soon after the 1991 Gulf War?
How many other Bush family members have enjoyed such patronage from the
Kuwait royal family? Wouldn't an honest ex-president have avoided even
the appearance of impropriety by discouraging such links? |
[ To reply to this message, you must first logon or register ]
|